by Caleb » Sat Dec 28, 2013 11:38 pm
I saw this too, but I'm viewing it with serious scrutiny. For one, Denzel doesn't seem to take roles where his name isn't on top of the poster (and here he'd be third banana, at best). For two, I can't really see them building a GL franchise around a 50 year old man. "Still got it", as far as Denzel goes, translates into talent, not the ability to do aerobic space stunts. He's fine with a gun and all, but I seriously have a LOT of trouble picturing him as GL. Elba, Ejiofor, Mackie, Oyelowo...fine, those guys I can see as Stewart. But Denzel? Uh, no.
Of course, BvS ain't exactly known for sound casting.
The big problem, if they really are trying to shoehorn ANOTHER superhero into the movie, is that they're seriously going to hinder important plot and character development. Batman was fine (not really, but it could still work) but every time they add a superhero, my faith in this film dies a little. Seriously, there is such a thing as too much, and I wish DC / WB would figure that out. The Avengers had four or five movies to set everything up and establish the characters on their own before throwing them together as a team. I'm not saying that DC / WB has to follow their template, but cramming this many characters into a sequel to a film with an already-flimsy screenplay? Just seems like the writers have equated "More heroes" to "Better story". Which isn't the case.
Look, maybe I'm wrong and it'll work. But they didn't do a great job developing Superman last time around, so my faith is at a minimum. And the more characters with complex mythology they throw in there, it's more time taken away from developing Superman and cleaning up the open ends left by Man of Steel.